There are some actions in life that upon reflection seemed to have been integral parts of the result of a certain process. For instance, when K. came to pick his things up because of a small quarrel we had, how would I have known that that moment was in fact the first step towards our total separateness which would occur a few weeks later.
Of course, this is the basis of good storytelling…setting up elements that resonate later. However, in real life, you only assess their meaning after the fact. In movies, the scriptwriter knows why that or this bit is inserted there. Although he may try to camouflage it.
I guess the art is in the camouflage?
—–
1 july 2008
A story’s limits have to be communicated to the viewer. Either by habit like in Hollywood movies, or explicitely outlined like in “In Bruges” or even better yet, seamlessly integrated like in my next project.
If no limits are determined, the writer suffers an anxiety as to where he can go exactly. This is the Korine syndrome where the film becomes a series of vignettes. It works because the sheer weirdness is such an unique voice (to some). These films I will designate as sprawling narratives. Not to be confused with the seemingly sprawling narratives of Malick who in fact delineates the world of the movie concisely.
